Archive for the ‘High school art’ category

The Brave Art Teacher: Making the Contemporary High School Art Class Relevant to Your Students

August 10th, 2011

We teach in contemporary, not modern times. This realization requires a transformative pedagogical approach to the teaching of high school art. The term “modern” leads people to believe that whatever stems from it is cutting-edge and alive. However, in art terms, modern is of the past — and contemporary is of today.

For instance, Matisse and Picasso, two “modern” artists who work in different “styles” are no longer at the cutting edge of contemporary culture. While both men were art mavericks in their own right and spoke to the issues of their times, they are not our contemporaries — and dare I say — they are largely of little relevance to contemporary teenagers. Of course, I do not advocate that we entirely erase their (or the canon’s) contribution to art’s history – but I surely don’t see them as the most inspiring artists for teens to be exposed to. There are plenty of contemporary artists who talk about the critical issues of today such as sustainability, body image, spirit, consumption; who use contemporary media such as video, sound, and installation; and who make art for public and/or personal reasons. Your high school art students see artists such as these as much more relevant to their lives.

Henry Warwick, an interdisciplinary artist and professor, contextualizes “culture today” as in an “eternal contemporary” condition – a sort of schizoid hypermodernity void of the lulls that past eras have provided. For example, between approximately 600 and 1400 in Western Europe, art, music, and fashion changed little during a time of absolute church authority. The era between the 1400′s to the mid 1800′s showed little change at first. However, as European (and later, American) society changed its energy base from solar and renewable sources (such as wind, water, human and animal power) to exponentially more powerful fossil or nonrenewable fuels (first coal, then oil and natural gas and nuclear), it naturally accelerated the exchange of signifiers of social change. From there, we jump into the Industrial Age to the Technological to the Conceptual Age and smack into the Eternal Contemporary. This era’s mode makes sense if you think about how quickly fashion comes in and out of favor: shoes, music, make-up, news, politics, cultural musings, technology and industry quickly change.

In other words, extended eras of living are gone as the contemporary is eternally moving – and our curriculum must move too! Within an eternal contemporary construct, we cannot expect last school year’s curriculum to be relevant to this year’s students. » Read more: The Brave Art Teacher: Making the Contemporary High School Art Class Relevant to Your Students

Validating Humanness: Why the Brave Art Teacher Allows for Reflection

August 10th, 2011

After your high school art students have spent time working on a meaningful piece of art, it is important to acknowledge their efforts through dialog. Often, this comes in the form of a group reflection (sometimes called critiques) and it can offer students an invaluable opportunity for learning and insight.

Conversations solicited between groups of people provides more insight than any one teacher or person can give, as they are more three-dimensional in feedback and grant differing perceptions, perspectives, responses and suggestions. Their sounds, which come in the forms of responding, sharing, and listening to (and about) a classmate’s work of art, is of the utmost importance to the high school art student. Such reflections expand the life experiences of the student that exist beyond his or her “one story,” while at the same time exposing similarities and differences shared by other students.

Imagine spending large amounts of time on an “assignment” that you care about and then receiving no acknowledgment (or validation) for your efforts. I have witnessed art teachers do this more often than not when they collect the “lesson” after a week or two of studio work and either grade it with little to no student input or post it on a wall for a quick, one-dimensional critique from one voice: the teacher’s. Such lack of compassion does not validate the human component of the art: the value of the student’s voice.

As an art education professor, I advocate the necessity and joy of “slowing down” the curriculum-not dumbing it down (and provide ways and means to do so). This involves taking steps to ensure time is being spent talking, sharing and supporting the art’s content – most notably during reflection time. Devote as much time as needed to discussing EVERY student’s art while linking past knowledge with new knowledge. This may take one or more entire class days, but because reflection is so foundational to a high school art class, time does not matter. Furthermore, students know their work will be shared, and this makes them want to present work they are proud of. Given this, it is important to dignify their attempts and provide them with a sense that what they made has value and what they have to say matters. » Read more: Validating Humanness: Why the Brave Art Teacher Allows for Reflection